THE LARGEST BMW 2-SERIES FORUM ON THE PLANET
2Addicts
2Addicts
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
2Addicts | BMW 2-Series forum Technical Topics N55 (M235i) Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Tuning BMW ZF8 Torque Capacity?

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-22-2014, 06:31 PM   #1
JustinCredibleM
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
287
Posts

Drives: '15 GT-R, '02 996TT
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV | San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

BMW ZF8 Torque Capacity?

I tried doing a search on this, but I keep getting different results when trying to find the max torque capacity for this transmission. Does anyone know how much power this transmission is capable of? I saw results ranging from ~350wtq to as high as 500wtq.

Wikipedia shows that it can support ~450NM assuming its the HP45 seires? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_8HP_...F_8HP_variants

I saw the Burger Tuning 435 making around 450wtq on their setup so I assume it has a high rating, but I just want to know for sure.

Last edited by JustinCredibleM; 03-22-2014 at 06:39 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 12:17 AM   #2
Greenkirby21
Vrooom :)
Greenkirby21's Avatar
United_States
313
Rep
2,602
Posts

Drives: C7 Stringray
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dream Land

iTrader: (1)

yup I believe you are correct. According to real-oem, the M235i manual and auto are the same model # as the F30 335i.

Manual max is 470 nm
Auto max is 450 nm
__________________
2014 C7 Corvette Stringray - Laguna Blue - NPP Exhaust - Competition Seats
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 12:35 AM   #3
JustinCredibleM
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
287
Posts

Drives: '15 GT-R, '02 996TT
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV | San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenkirby21 View Post
yup I believe you are correct. According to real-oem, the M235i manual and auto are the same model # as the F30 335i.

Manual max is 470 nm
Auto max is 450 nm
That should convert to around ~330 foot pounds though and the car is rated as such from stock. It seems a little odd to me if the capacity is already stock though.
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 03:19 PM   #4
M.barnes
Captain
41
Rep
598
Posts

Drives: 123d
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rugby, uk

iTrader: (0)

Yeah the gearbox is already at its max recommended torque
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 05:28 PM   #5
Brings
Clap Trap~
United_States
77
Rep
169
Posts

Drives: '15 M3, '93 NSX
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (4)

Kind of scary to hear that considering the N55 can generate tons of extra torque just from breathing on it at a different angle...
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 05:48 PM   #6
Greenkirby21
Vrooom :)
Greenkirby21's Avatar
United_States
313
Rep
2,602
Posts

Drives: C7 Stringray
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dream Land

iTrader: (1)

Ya.. How do the current F series car last so long with JB4, downpipe, and all the other stuff?
__________________
2014 C7 Corvette Stringray - Laguna Blue - NPP Exhaust - Competition Seats
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2014, 06:40 PM   #7
ska///235i
***** noob
ska///235i's Avatar
United_States
1366
Rep
10,479
Posts

Drives: 325xi>M235i>428GCx Mspor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

iTrader: (34)

Garage List
2006 325xi  [0.00]
I highly doubt anybody is really pushing all 360hp on the streets...its all for bragging rights

Their waterpump or some other stuff will get blown before they can use all that HP and cause the tranny to fail
__________________
2006 325xi (Sold)
2014 M235I (Current)
2015 428xi Gran Coupe (STB)
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 02:01 AM   #8
JustinCredibleM
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
287
Posts

Drives: '15 GT-R, '02 996TT
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV | San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ska325xi View Post
I highly doubt anybody is really pushing all 360hp on the streets...its all for bragging rights

Their waterpump or some other stuff will get blown before they can use all that HP and cause the tranny to fail
How does that work with F-series cars with same tranny making 400wtq+?
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 11:21 AM   #9
ska///235i
***** noob
ska///235i's Avatar
United_States
1366
Rep
10,479
Posts

Drives: 325xi>M235i>428GCx Mspor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

iTrader: (34)

Garage List
2006 325xi  [0.00]
I was trying to say other things will break down before the tranny will
__________________
2006 325xi (Sold)
2014 M235I (Current)
2015 428xi Gran Coupe (STB)
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 04:40 PM   #10
M.barnes
Captain
41
Rep
598
Posts

Drives: 123d
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rugby, uk

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinCredibleM View Post
How does that work with F-series cars with same tranny making 400wtq+?
How does it work or how long will it work?

Quite possibly the box can handle more, personally I don't fancy trying while I have warranty
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2014, 09:38 PM   #11
255zr
Private First Class
63
Rep
142
Posts

Drives: 2020 X5 M50i
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (0)

I was looking at a Dinan tune as it maintains the original BMW warranty. Would be surprised they would let you increase the torque to around 400lb/ft yet maintain the warranty if the tranny tops at 330lb/ft
Appreciate 0
      03-27-2014, 12:24 AM   #12
thomps
Private First Class
4
Rep
134
Posts

Drives: 2015 M235i
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere, man.

iTrader: (0)

Really, really curious to hear an informed opinion on this. The torque ratings are especially strange given the tendency of BMW to underrate these cars from the factory. It's really hard to believe BMW would allow a car to leave the factory with power above and beyond the transmission's true limit.

If the auto is anywhere near maxed out from the factory, that's enough to scare me into the manual trans despite the fact that my circumstances pretty much require an auto. And I remember some discussion that the manual trans had inherited some parts from the M3/M4, which was comforting, but if the manual trans is also nearly maxed out from the factory, I'm afraid I'll have to forget about the M235i altogether. Again, I doubt this is the case, but I'm not trying to be the guinea pig.

I did some research, especially with respect to the M135i, and there's been lots of talk (see threads below) but no real consensus.

http://www.babybmw.net/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=48109

http://www.f30post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=937956

http://f20.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=837879

http://f20.1addicts.com/forums/showt...5#post14845115
Appreciate 0
      03-27-2014, 04:59 PM   #13
255zr
Private First Class
63
Rep
142
Posts

Drives: 2020 X5 M50i
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (0)

Doesn't answer your question, but if I do a tune (Dinan) that doesn't void the warranty at that point it's not my problem anymore
Appreciate 0
      03-28-2014, 07:12 AM   #14
ShlemonboostedM
Banned
ShlemonboostedM's Avatar
92
Rep
586
Posts

Drives: 335i F30
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: brooklyn ny

iTrader: (4)

Pushing about 400-450lbft in fbo f30 on 8zf for 8 months already not a single problem .. Those trannys are over build ... Read a post on 3/4 f30/32 theirs zf rep. Telling that trannys are way overbuild and can handle much much more the. They were design for .. Haven't heard a single official tranny break down yet ..
Appreciate 0
      03-28-2014, 12:18 PM   #15
ska///235i
***** noob
ska///235i's Avatar
United_States
1366
Rep
10,479
Posts

Drives: 325xi>M235i>428GCx Mspor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

iTrader: (34)

Garage List
2006 325xi  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomps
Really, really curious to hear an informed opinion on this. The torque ratings are especially strange given the tendency of BMW to underrate these cars from the factory. It's really hard to believe BMW would allow a car to leave the factory with power above and beyond the transmission's true limit.

If the auto is anywhere near maxed out from the factory, that's enough to scare me into the manual trans despite the fact that my circumstances pretty much require an auto. And I remember some discussion that the manual trans had inherited some parts from the M3/M4, which was comforting, but if the manual trans is also nearly maxed out from the factory, I'm afraid I'll have to forget about the M235i altogether. Again, I doubt this is the case, but I'm not trying to be the guinea pig.

I did some research, especially with respect to the M135i, and there's been lots of talk (see threads below) but no real consensus.

http://www.babybmw.net/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=48109

http://www.f30post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=937956

http://f20.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=837879

http://f20.1addicts.com/forums/showt...5#post14845115
Keep in mind bmw doesnt built these trannies, they're from 3rd party
__________________
2006 325xi (Sold)
2014 M235I (Current)
2015 428xi Gran Coupe (STB)
Appreciate 0
      04-12-2014, 06:41 PM   #16
thomps
Private First Class
4
Rep
134
Posts

Drives: 2015 M235i
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere, man.

iTrader: (0)

Now that people are actually getting their hands on the car and modifying it, I'd like to keep this thread relevant.

Anybody modding ZF8-equipped M235i's yet? Problems? (I know, it's still early-- knock on wood)
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2014, 06:49 PM   #17
PeteA
Major
PeteA's Avatar
Australia
127
Rep
1,054
Posts

Drives: E30, E82
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Melbourne

iTrader: (3)

ZF8 should be fine from a reliability standpoint.

Generally automatics better than the manuals at withstanding torque over time as they don't wear like clutch plates would. However one perspective is that a clutch plate is easily replaced/upgraded...

The only transmission that has been known to slip when tuned on the N55 is the DCT.

The ZF8 speed on a diesel variant seems to have a torque limit of 500Nm which is the same gearbox...8HP45.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2014, 07:30 PM   #18
DanG
Major General
DanG's Avatar
United_States
10549
Rep
6,908
Posts

Drives: 2018 M2 AW DCT
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2018 BMW M2  [7.68]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 255zr View Post
Doesn't answer your question, but if I do a tune (Dinan) that doesn't void the warranty at that point it's not my problem anymore
Actually you are mistaken. Dinan upgrades do void the BMW warranty. Dinan warranties the parts until the BMW warranty would have expired.
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2014, 05:11 AM   #19
Bruce GT3
Private
6
Rep
51
Posts

Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United Kingdom

iTrader: (0)

Guys, don't forget that the non-USA market has been running the same 'box in the "same" chassis for more than 2 years in the M135i.

I've been running 395 bhp and 450 lbft (approx 610 Nm) of torque through the ZF-8HP45 on my M135i for around 6k miles without any issues.

If it does blow up it's down to me and that's a bridge I'll have to cross when I come to it. But I'm happy that ZF will have overspecc'ed the tranny anyway. ZF have a whole range of 8HP trannies as a modular system that go up to the mighty 8HP90 that's fitted to the Bentley Continental GT and is good for 900 Nm, so I'm confident that it should be possible to upgrade the transmission when required...

http://www.zf.com/media/media/img_1/...Produkt_EN.pdf
__________________
2013 M135i N55 F21 | Scorpion TBE and Decat |AirREX & Accuair air-ride | JB4 Stage 2 | BMW MP Blackline lights | BMW MP grills | SSDD Carbon Splitter | Birds/Quaife ATB diff | Forge intercooler and atmo BOV
Appreciate 0
      05-07-2014, 07:36 AM   #20
adrianv
New Member
2
Rep
23
Posts

Drives: M235
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (0)

Well, I lot of this is speculation, but I can make some observations:

The "launch control" on the sport auto is nothing more than standing on the gas and brake, loading up the torque converter, and releasing the brake. This is obvious from observing what the car is doing when using it. There is no observable difference between activating launch control and using the same proceedure of brake-launching in D and comfort.

Historically, this technique for launching automatics has been around for decades. It is extremely hard on the torque converter, but it is a very effective technique.

This is the only automatic I have ever seen that the OEM sanctions "abusing" the transmission this way and calls it "launch control". This has the implication that BMW will cover a transmission failure due to using launch control under warranty.

BMW would not recommend using the transmission this way unless there was significant headroom in the torque handling of the transmission. Automotive OEMs are extremely risk averse when it comes to the actuarial analysis of their warranty cost and exposure.

All of these observations together make be believe that this particular transmission is very over engineered and has an enormous design headroom in its torque handling capability. It wouldn't make any logical sense for BMW to implement a launch control in a way that is literally the most abusive thing you can do to a traditional automatic if it that was not the case.
Appreciate 0
      05-14-2014, 09:30 AM   #21
PhilAnthony
Private
9
Rep
51
Posts

Drives: 2017 Jeep GC
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Suffolk County

iTrader: (0)

Not going to lie... I have a 2013 335IX F30 with ZF8 and after installing ER dp and JB4 -- I was running maps 1,2, 5, and 7 with 100 octane and even some E20 to see how it responded. I was loving hthe beta map 5 that was release for the Fseries..

Until about 2 months ago, I had no problems. Then on a cold morning, I went full throttle on Map 2 (with dp, same setup dynoed at ~360whp and 450wtq) I ran into some slippage in the transmission. It would NOT catch gears from 1-2, 2-3, even 3-4 at heavy throttle shifting at its major torque making rpms (like 3500-5500)... I was stunned because I had not read one single complaint. The car would accelerate like a rocket but when shifting it would throw you forward because it was like hitting the breaks. It took very long to shift into the next gear and the momentum was broken. It was not normal and it was very much a fucking bad shift. I was so mad.

I was fairly certain that the tranny was overbuilt but once it started to slip I kept trying to turn off the JB4 and engine to see if it was a computer error. NO check engine light came on and NO shadow codes or tuner codes when read with BT Scan Tool. The transmission wasn't warning me or the computer about this.

I was due for an upcoming oil change so I removed the dp and the JB4.... told the service about the problem amongst other things. The water pump would turn on and continue to run after long drives and the oil gauge would note that oil was low (damn N55s suck up oil) and the car would also run a bit hot. I continued to feel the slip (maybe doing it too much .. like a bad scab on the elbow that you can't stop picking at). I feel that the clutch packs are toast and I would love to see the tranny fluid.

Not sure what BMW will be able to do for me since there is no check engine light. I am hoping they check fluid and other things. The good thing is after I would turn off the JB4, it would NOT slip anymore.

After noticing that the slip only occurred with the JB4, I figured it was most definitely due to the torque and stress on the tranny. I read someone's post on a thread I started about this problem and he said something along the line of "I like to think that the problem already existed and was exacerbated by the mods" ... so maybe the transmission was faulty from the start and it was made more blatant with the tune and dp.

I dropped my car off today actually. Got a loaner car for now. It is all stock and codes deleted (tuner codes like O2 sensor, blowoff valve jammed close, MAF problems). I hope they find it to be something simple like low transmission fluid or something (i am no mechanic lol). I think I remember seeing some fluid that had leaked from underneath and left its mark on the removable undercarriage that covers the tranny and turbo/cat. Maybe something blew?

Will update you on what happens. It will be hard to diagnose the problem if they cannot reproduce it (no more JB4).

EDIT: from adrianv's post ... I may have done a good amount of launches using the brake and accelerator with the jb4 active ... could the torque converter be "worn out" or "bad" from these launches?? I cannot recall how often I would do them because I only had the tune on for about 5 weeks and I have had it off for about 3 weeks.

Thanks.
Appreciate 0
      05-14-2014, 04:35 PM   #22
JustinCredibleM
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep
287
Posts

Drives: '15 GT-R, '02 996TT
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Vegas, NV | San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

@PhilAnthony - Considering how much torque these cars make down low and almost full torque at 2,000 RPM, you probably loaded up the torque converter too much with your launches. I don't plan on ever launching considering the amount of torque it is generate with the JB4 active. I am curious how BMW will handle this, since I would be pretty sad if my transmission started doing that. But the BMS 435 makes 450wtq and they haven't mentioned any issues (yet).
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.




2addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST