BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-26-2009, 04:17 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant General
1226
Rep 12,446
Posts |
KERS for Heidfeld, but not Kubica for Australian Grand Prix
KERS for Heidfeld, but not Kubica for Australian Grand Prix Nick Heidfeld's BMW-Sauber F1.09, but not that of his teammate Robert Kubica, will be fitted with an active KERS system for the Australian grand prix weekend. The news was confirmed not only by German Heidfeld, 31, but also his team boss Mario Theissen. The reason for the split strategy is due to the weight of the drivers: while diminutive Heidfeld is perhaps the lightest in the entire 2009 field, Kubica - one of the tallest drivers - would have made his F1.09 ten kilograms overweight had he elected to run KERS. "The regulations mean that heavy drivers are disadvantaged," Theissen said in Melbourne. He added that he hopes an advantageous KERS solution will be able to be devised for Kubica, for deployment later this season. Source: http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090326....ian-grand-prix
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
03-26-2009, 04:27 PM | #2 |
gone but not forgotten
35
Rep 985
Posts |
I never understood how the rules limit vehicle weight. Doesn't more weight mean a disadvantage?
__________________
Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration don't fail me now.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2009, 05:03 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
391
Rep 4,320
Posts
Drives: '07 Z4 M Coupe
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metro-Detroit
|
Are any other teams running KERS this weekend, or is Heidfeld it?
It'd be awesome to see Nick top last year's 2nd place by starting the season with him first top podium!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2009, 05:18 PM | #4 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
2007
Rep 61,781
Posts
Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .
|
Quote:
for heavier (taller) drivers....the engineers has less flexibility to move ballast around to keep a good weight distribution....as well as KERS gives less flexibility..... probably robert's car with KERS is already very close to the minimum weight....so the engineers are unable to balance the car out with very limited ballast available....so they set up the car without KERS and have approx 35kg of ballast on their disposal....
__________________
Last edited by E90SLAM; 03-26-2009 at 06:01 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2009, 05:49 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant General
1226
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2009, 06:02 PM | #6 |
Supreme Allied Commander
2007
Rep 61,781
Posts
Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .
|
sorry...i do mean minimum weight (typo above)...everyone is going to keep their car and driver total weight "just above" that limit....
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|