BMW E60 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com  
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Go Back   BMW E60 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-07-2013, 11:08 AM   #23
ToothDoc
Second Lieutenant
5
Rep
241
Posts

Drives: 997.2 TTS, CLA 45 AMG
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicagoland

iTrader: (0)

AWD is better for acceleration. Not for turning. Cars that have a heavy rear weight bias won't benefit as much but cars that have an even f/r balance and have a ton of horsepower will definitely benefit. Drag cars shift all their weight to the rear so they won't benefit but actually lose due to the extra weight.

Most street cars simply don't have the power to lay down rubber from a 60 mph roll so AWD isn't really necessary on the track.

If F1 rules were changed to allow AWD, those cars have the HP and NEED the traction to get going and would greatly benefit from it.

For the same reason, awd works in those types of tracks where traction is limited so definitely in rally, off-road, etc.

In a nutshell, our cars aren't powerful enough (yet) to benefit from AWD.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:09 AM   #24
Billup
Banned
Burkina Faso
472
Rep
928
Posts

Drives: Your mum crazy.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Baconopolos Island

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by elistan View Post
If Wikipedia is to be believed, keep in mind that the GTR was only 1.54 seconds behind (after 442 seconds - 0.3% difference) with the disadvantage of a "semi-wet" track. And despite more horsepower, the GTR is heavy enough to have a power-to-weight disadvantage compared to the Z06. (The lap time listed in Wikipedia was done with, it appears, the 523 hp version.) The fact that it was so close given those challenges is pretty remarkable. Strip the GTR down to Z06 weight (probably wouldn't be street legal then ) and adjust the hp down to 505 hp like with the Z06, and I suspect the tables would be turned...
So you are comparing all the aesthetics of each vehicle that gives it its own individuality from one another. It may have been close (although I think anything less than .75 is considered close in racing), but RWD will always prevail. You can start taking down weight, reducing power, yada yada yada, but then you are just making two equal cars go head to head, where's the realism behind that? The tables would be turned because its an unrealistic comparison. Nissan builds an AWD system through testing thinking it can compete with the Vetter or Viper, and it failed to deliver, plain and simple.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:14 AM   #25
scorcherjf
Captain
scorcherjf's Avatar
29
Rep
769
Posts

Drives: 2008 135i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 135i  [0.00]
For scenarios on an asphalt racetrack, AWD's advantage is really on corner exit where the power can be applied sooner (usually) than a RWD car. The penalty of AWD is added weight, added drivetrain loss, usually higher center of gravity since the engine is usually mounted higher to account for the extra drive shafts, and also a higher polar moment of inertia.

The best AWD track stars are probably the lamborghinis and the nissan GTR but I don't think they can achieve as low of a center of gravity and polar moment as a Ferrari 458 or McLaren MP4-12C.

Anyway, your experience with the STi is really just an anecdote in isolation since we know nothing about the modifications of either cars. Tires alone could have made all the difference, not just because the STi is AWD. Also, the most important unknown... the drivers.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:20 AM   #26
Litos
Banned
United_States
220
Rep
2,991
Posts

Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billup View Post
Nissan builds an AWD system through testing thinking it can compete with the Vetter or Viper, and it failed to deliver, plain and simple.
this guy gets it.

an AWD car will never be at the top of any fastest times list....
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:25 AM   #27
elistan
First Lieutenant
United_States
38
Rep
387
Posts

Drives: F30 328i, AP1 S2000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Longmont, CO

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
the Aventador LP-400 is AWD with 690hp and STILL can't beat a Viper around Laguna Seca....

RWD, ya'll.......
True.

Based on MT's 2012 Best Driver's car:
Aventador LP 700-4: 4109 lbs as tested, 691 hp. 1:35.40.

Based on MT's article about the 2014 Viper SRT Time Attack:
Viper SRT TA: 3332 lbs as tested, 640 hp. 1:33.62.

Same driver, but different days. 14% power to weight ratio advantage for the Viper, but only 2% advantage in lap time.

(ps - when thinking about "4109 lbs," the word that comes to my mind is "pig." Although I'm sure it's fun to drive regardless. )
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:29 AM   #28
elistan
First Lieutenant
United_States
38
Rep
387
Posts

Drives: F30 328i, AP1 S2000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Longmont, CO

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
it still lost, even with the misconception that AWD is better/faster.......
I would instead say that the advantage of the AWD wasn't enough to overcome the disadvantage of the greater weight and wet track.

I'm curious about your thoughts on why RWD is faster. Is it because it's lighter? Yes, of course, I'd totally agree there. What else...?
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:29 AM   #29
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
72
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Because the purpose of AWD isn't to win races on tracks with perfect conditions, it's purpose is for increased traction in non-perfect conditions.

On a snow covered track, AWD cars will beat comparable RWD cars all day long.

On a normal track, the extra weight, and bigger drive train loss will be big disadvantages against a traditional RWD platform. Think of AWD and RWD as different tools for different purposes and it makes sense. You use a hammer on nails, and a screw driver on screws, and not vice-versa for a reason.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:50 AM   #30
Litos
Banned
United_States
220
Rep
2,991
Posts

Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by elistan View Post
I would instead say that the advantage of the AWD wasn't enough to overcome the disadvantage of the greater weight and wet track.

I'm curious about your thoughts on why RWD is faster. Is it because it's lighter? Yes, of course, I'd totally agree there. What else...?
read post #30.

i've been posting on car forums since 2004 - i get tired of explaining the whole RWD vs AWD thing.

it was just as old a decade ago as it is today.....
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:53 AM   #31
elistan
First Lieutenant
United_States
38
Rep
387
Posts

Drives: F30 328i, AP1 S2000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Longmont, CO

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billup View Post
You can start taking down weight, reducing power, yada yada yada, but then you are just making two equal cars go head to head, where's the realism behind that? The tables would be turned because its an unrealistic comparison.
But that's racing. There are weight restrictions, horsepower restrictions, dimensional restrictions, tire restrictions, aero restrictions... Racing is not "reality" in that sense. However, AWD certainly has a weight penalty in street cars, and that certainly shows up often in street car performance... I wonder how a 991 S and 991 4S would compare head-to-head on the same track on the same day with the same driver. Porsche says there's only a 111 lbs difference. It's the best sort of "all else equal" test. I suspect a novice like me would be faster in the 4S, while a more experienced driver like Randy Pobst could get to the edge of the performance envelope of the S just as easily as the 4S, and the weight advantage of the S would be the deciding factor.

Quote:
Nissan builds an AWD system through testing thinking it can compete with the Vetter or Viper, and it failed to deliver, plain and simple.
IIRC, when it was released in 2007 the GTR was faster than it's RWD Corvette and Viper competition around the Nurburgring. Not what I'd call a failure to deliver. But there's still a bit of an arms race among some vehicle manufacturers - MT's article about the Viper GTS Time Attack notes how SRT president Ralph Gilles was pissed about a test showing a Corvette ZR1 as faster than a Viper GTS, and the TA version was a direct result of that - so it's not surprising to me we're seeing Chevy and Chrysler with the faster cars. Nissan is continuing to tweak the GTR, but it's not clear how much attention they're paying to those cars.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:54 AM   #32
Litos
Banned
United_States
220
Rep
2,991
Posts

Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by elistan View Post
Nissan is continuing to tweak the GTR, but it's not clear how much attention they're paying to those cars.
if they'ne not openly GOING AFTER those cars, Nissan is doing it wrong....
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 11:56 AM   #33
Billup
Banned
Burkina Faso
472
Rep
928
Posts

Drives: Your mum crazy.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Baconopolos Island

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by elistan View Post
I would instead say that the advantage of the AWD wasn't enough to overcome the disadvantage of the greater weight and wet track.

I'm curious about your thoughts on why RWD is faster. Is it because it's lighter? Yes, of course, I'd totally agree there. What else...?
Not only lighter, but the transfer of direct inert energy to two wheels would naturally create a quicker response time as well, since you are eliminating the much needed increase in power to accommodate all four wheels. What does an AWD foundation provide other than an added amount of traction in a situation where traction isn't exactly going to benefit that much more. Now if it were on a dirt track, AWD would prove what its existence is and always will be intended for.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:01 PM   #34
elistan
First Lieutenant
United_States
38
Rep
387
Posts

Drives: F30 328i, AP1 S2000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Longmont, CO

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
read post #30.

i've been posting on car forums since 2004 - i get tired of explaining the whole RWD vs AWD thing.

it was just as old a decade ago as it is today.....
Gotcha. Extra weight and extra drive train loss. Certainly agree with you there!
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:04 PM   #35
Sandye90m3
Major
Sandye90m3's Avatar
Canada
167
Rep
1,159
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary, CA

iTrader: (0)

I think for novice drivers or even intermediate drivers, AWD will be faster than RWD. AWD is very easy to drive "fast" because there is so much traction and the only thing that could really happen is understeer which is very predictable compared to oversteer IMO.

Having said that, advanced driver/experts can use RWD to its full potential because first, they are more light and secondly the car is more agile compared to the numbness in a AWD.

For example, in an AWD you can just hammer the throttle around a turn and generically you'll be safe. However in a RWD you need to squeeze that throttle input as linearly as you can, and when perfected it would destroy a AWD.
__________________
M3.E90 JZB Coded.GTSDCT.BomizValved.TurnerTestPipes.ResDelete .EurochargedTune.AAFilter.HRER40s
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:13 PM   #36
MiddleAgedAl
Lieutenant
110
Rep
418
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sitting down, facing the keyboard

iTrader: (0)

Understeer is slow. AWD will unduce understeer, not just because of the extra weight up front, which doesnt help, but also because the tires can only give so much. As you start asking the tire to pull you forward, it reduces the tire's ability to hold side loads for cornering. Cant have your cake and eat it too, at least not at the same time. (google Friction Circle)

I rode along for a few hot laps in GTR with a driver who knew what he was doing. I recall thinking (besides the fact the car is FUGLY): how did Nissan manage to make it so fast, while making it less "fun" at the same time ? It was strangely impressive and disappointing at the same time.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:22 PM   #37
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
72
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

That's the subjective part of RWD and AWD.

My take, RWD tingles the senses. AWD, you're sensing for that tingle.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:26 PM   #38
elistan
First Lieutenant
United_States
38
Rep
387
Posts

Drives: F30 328i, AP1 S2000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Longmont, CO

iTrader: (0)

Just for fun, here's some Audi TT RS in-car footage from Mid Ohio last weekend.

Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:46 PM   #39
kits135i
Private First Class
9
Rep
145
Posts

Drives: Coming Soon
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billup View Post
This is the most intelligent thing I've seen on the internet in a long time.
I will add you to my moron list. Do some research!!!
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:51 PM   #40
Billup
Banned
Burkina Faso
472
Rep
928
Posts

Drives: Your mum crazy.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Baconopolos Island

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kits135i View Post
I will add you to my moron list. Do some research!!!
You need to do the research, Mr. two superlatives. Common knowledge. Well..., apparently it is not.

I'm deeply concerned with this "moron list", however. I can't stand the thought of being on a complete strangers crap list. Let me know when I am off so I can resume sleeping at night.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:57 PM   #41
Litos
Banned
United_States
220
Rep
2,991
Posts

Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland

iTrader: (1)

two superlatives > AWD
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:57 PM   #42
Litos
Banned
United_States
220
Rep
2,991
Posts

Drives: 2012 Challenger RT Junk
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston/Pearland

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billup View Post
I'm deeply concerned with this "moron list", however. I can't stand the thought of being on a complete strangers crap list. Let me know when I am off so I can resume sleeping at night.
love this guy
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 12:59 PM   #43
Billup
Banned
Burkina Faso
472
Rep
928
Posts

Drives: Your mum crazy.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Baconopolos Island

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
two superlatives > AWD
That is surely the most dumbest thing ever. One superlative > AWD > RWD.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2013, 01:00 PM   #44
MediaArtist
There is No Substitute
MediaArtist's Avatar
United_States
72
Rep
1,186
Posts

Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billup View Post
That is surely the most dumbest thing ever. One superlative > AWD > RWD.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS
'08 BMW E90 335i
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST