BMW E60 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com  
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Go Back   BMW E60 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-22-2022, 10:35 PM   #1
TXSTYLE
"Salud"
TXSTYLE's Avatar
United_States
13656
Rep
4,663
Posts

Drives: F01 & F15 / Mineral White
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The GYM! (The Burbs - N TX)

iTrader: (0)

Lightbulb California Man Sues BMW For Taking Equity Over His Totaled M5 Competition

Interesting....

https://www.carscoops.com/2022/06/ca...5-competition/

Quote:
Alexander Russell signed a 36-month lease for a 2019 BMW M5 Competition in October 2019. At the time, the car was worth $115,816. Auto News reports that Russell was involved in a crash on February 14, 2022 that left the super sedan a total loss.

A lawsuit filed in the U.S. Central District of California asserts that the lease’s residual value was $81,589.57 but that the vehicle insurer, Safeco, had set the car’s market value at $106,178. Russell claims he should have been left with $24,589.40 in equity after the balance of the financing was repaid.
__________________
https://i.imgur.com/QAMZNzQ.jpg
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 01:29 AM   #2
________
________
4157
Rep
2,301
Posts

Drives: ________
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: ________

iTrader: (0)

LOL

No details, but assuming a zero/low down payment, guy is suing BMWFS for “enrichment” because he feels entitled to an amount he never had in the car. That wouldn’t be enrichment then.

What a time to be alive.
Appreciate 1
      06-23-2022, 05:59 AM   #3
rcracin
Major
1238
Rep
1,285
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC

iTrader: (3)

Kind of makes sense. It's his insurance and I believe he has the option to buy the car out of the lease, right?

Similar to people who leased cars pre pandemic and their buy out was less than market value. Easy money to be made.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 06:04 AM   #4
DocL
Captain
DocL's Avatar
United_States
1923
Rep
863
Posts

Drives: 2018 M3
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Delray Beach

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcracin View Post
Kind of makes sense. It's his insurance and I believe he has the option to buy the car out of the lease, right?

Similar to people who leased cars pre pandemic and their buy out was less than market value. Easy money to be made.
Then he should have bought it off the lease early if he wanted the equity. The car wasn’t his, he was only renting

if You rented a house that burned down would the insurance company give you more?
__________________
2018 F80 M3. YMB/BLK. ZCP. Three Pedals.
"Education will never be as expensive as ignorance."
Appreciate 4
RickFLM410883.50
Todd0131379.50
tcphoto3477.00
      06-23-2022, 06:30 AM   #5
kring
Second Lieutenant
United_States
323
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: ‘19 M550i Dinan S1, 340i
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Connecticut

iTrader: (0)

It is interesting because it is HIS insurance policy. Not BMWs. So technically he was cut the check, and then BMW balance was paid.. I might agree that it’s his policy, his entitlement.

It’s the same way that I can take a life insurance policy out on anyone, and if they die, I get paid. I am not sure BMW has any legitimate case here on why they kept the proceeds from his insurance policy.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 06:47 AM   #6
rcracin
Major
1238
Rep
1,285
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocL View Post
Then he should have bought it off the lease early if he wanted the equity. The car wasn’t his, he was only renting

if You rented a house that burned down would the insurance company give you more?
Your analogy would be comparable if you're renting the house with a stated value to purchase at any point during the lease or when the lease ends and also if you as the lessee carries the insurance policy.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 08:10 AM   #7
LuvMyE92
Occasionally frequent poster
LuvMyE92's Avatar
2994
Rep
2,742
Posts

Drives: CT5V-Blackwing
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: RTP NC, USA

iTrader: (0)

It's all moot. He does not own the car.
__________________
Current inventory:
F22 & G05
Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing w/3 pedals
Past: E24,E28(3),E34,E36,E37,E38(2),E39(4),E46,E89,E92 (obviously),F01,F06,F10,F30,F87,G12,G30(2),G82(2)
Appreciate 1
      06-23-2022, 08:15 AM   #8
freakystyly
Lieutenant Colonel
2870
Rep
1,758
Posts

Drives: F22 B58 6MT
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ontario

iTrader: (0)

He's doing it wrong, should have gotten a STD in the back seat instead.
Appreciate 4
paquet629.50
kscarrol8799.50
MR92_54.00
      06-23-2022, 08:16 AM   #9
ryan stewart
Major
2197
Rep
1,322
Posts

Drives: 2008 328it
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcracin View Post
Your analogy would be comparable if you're renting the house with a stated value to purchase at any point during the lease or when the lease ends and also if you as the lessee carries the insurance policy.
Technically but like said until you purchased it you still don't own it, you're still just renting it.

He would have had to buy out to have ownership stake.
Appreciate 1
DocL1922.50
      06-23-2022, 08:36 AM   #10
DETRoadster
Space Force - 4 Star General
DETRoadster's Avatar
11446
Rep
3,264
Posts

Drives: M2 MG 6MT / Moto Guzzi V7
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (1)

I'm sure there's language buried deep in the lease documents that no one reads, stating that YOU must provide insurance on the car to protect BMW's interest.

My wife is in a commercial lease for the building her business is in. She's required to carry a $5M insurance policy on the building to cover any damages she might cause. The lease is very clear that any damages are to be covered by her policy to protect the landlord's property and investment. She has zero claim to any equity in the building. I suspect the same is true for the BMW lease holder.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 08:45 AM   #11
zx10guy
Brigadier General
5139
Rep
3,235
Posts

Drives: 2013 135i
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: DC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DETRoadster View Post
I'm sure there's language buried deep in the lease documents that no one reads, stating that YOU must provide insurance on the car to protect BMW's interest.

My wife is in a commercial lease for the building her business is in. She's required to carry a $5M insurance policy on the building to cover any damages she might cause. The lease is very clear that any damages are to be covered by her policy to protect the landlord's property and investment. She has zero claim to any equity in the building. I suspect the same is true for the BMW lease holder.
Also the same with homeowners where if you don't have enough equity stake in the house in relation to the mortgage, you have to take out PMI (private mortgage insurance). Where PMI pays out to the bank any deficiencies if you default on the loan.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lups View Post
We might not be in an agreement on Trump, but I'll be the first penis chaser here to say I'll rather take it up in the ass than to argue with you on this.
Appreciate 2
DETRoadster11446.00
DocL1922.50
      06-23-2022, 09:02 AM   #12
kring
Second Lieutenant
United_States
323
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: ‘19 M550i Dinan S1, 340i
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Connecticut

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvMyE92 View Post
It's all moot. He does not own the car.
I don't own you, but I can have an insurance policy on you and there's nothing you can do about it and I get paid if something were to happen to you. He OWNS the policy, and therefor the payout... FULL STOP, no discussion... now he still has obligation and likely a LEAN on the car so that would need to be fulfilled for the outstand balance. his insurance is to make HIM whole. this isn't gap insurance, it's the opposite. the gap is more than closed by the insurance proceeds and therefore, it can only be his.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan stewart View Post
Technically but like said until you purchased it you still don't own it, you're still just renting it.

He would have had to buy out to have ownership stake.
That would make it a cut & dry case; but the lease may be still valid as entitled to the proceeds of the insurance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DETRoadster View Post
I'm sure there's language buried deep in the lease documents that no one reads, stating that YOU must provide insurance on the car to protect BMW's interest.
It's not a question of If he needs to hold insurances, it absolutely is in the contract that insurance is required, and in most states it's a legal requirement and a requirement to register the vehicle.

The question is with the insurance HE signed up for and pays... why would he NOT be entitled to the money... I believe 100% he is entitled to the full amount as it's his policy... ownership is irrelevant. Now BMW would have a LEAN on the car and leans are required to be paid first... his LEAN is for the remaining balance... which is ALL that BMW is entitled to, the amount of the LEAN. after that, any remaining balance would absolutely be his. BMW's interest stops at the the cars value, anything beyond that is his interests.

Especially if the cost of cars and replacement have gone up - that would offset his loss or negative position in trying to replace like-for-like.... the whole point of the insurance policy is to be whole in the end... BMW stole his money.

fairly certain his case is rock-solid and he'll win it outright... might even get compensation.

What we don't know - is there more weird California laws or something shady in the lease fine print that says BMW is entitled to more and you waive your right... which I think could then also be challenged to the legality of that type of fine print.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 09:09 AM   #13
Run Silent
Run Deep
Run Silent's Avatar
United_States
15127
Rep
4,123
Posts

Drives: Back and Forth To Work
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: The Mountains

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
So in a normal world - if he leased the car and had insurance on it and it was totaled - and the balance on his lease contract (residual plus remaining payments) was $80,000 and the insurance company valued the car at $60,000 - he would owe the remaining $20,000 to BMW financial, right?

Why wouldn't the other way be the same?

If his remaining payments and residual was $80,000 and the insurance company valued the car at $100,000 - wouldn't he be owed $20,000?

Pretty shit if the door doesn't swing both directions.

Just another reason I don't borrow money, lol.
__________________
Don't sweat petty things....or pet sweaty things.
Appreciate 3
      06-23-2022, 09:32 AM   #14
rcracin
Major
1238
Rep
1,285
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Run Silent View Post
So in a normal world - if he leased the car and had insurance on it and it was totaled - and the balance on his lease contract (residual plus remaining payments) was $80,000 and the insurance company valued the car at $60,000 - he would owe the remaining $20,000 to BMW financial, right?

Why wouldn't the other way be the same?

If his remaining payments and residual was $80,000 and the insurance company valued the car at $100,000 - wouldn't he be owed $20,000?

Pretty shit if the door doesn't swing both directions.

Just another reason I don't borrow money, lol.
This is the correct expectation to me and expectation is all we can discuss here absent a thorough reading of the contract.
Appreciate 1
DETRoadster11446.00
      06-23-2022, 10:00 AM   #15
TXSTYLE
"Salud"
TXSTYLE's Avatar
United_States
13656
Rep
4,663
Posts

Drives: F01 & F15 / Mineral White
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The GYM! (The Burbs - N TX)

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kring View Post
It is interesting because it is HIS insurance policy. Not BMWs. So technically he was cut the check, and then BMW balance was paid.. I might agree that it’s his policy, his entitlement.

It’s the same way that I can take a life insurance policy out on anyone, and if they die, I get paid. I am not sure BMW has any legitimate case here on why they kept the proceeds from his insurance policy.
This is exactly how I see it and thought while reading the article.
Not to mention there are quite a lot of owners joining in on the class action suit. So it's definitely NOT isolated.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 10:04 AM   #16
TXSTYLE
"Salud"
TXSTYLE's Avatar
United_States
13656
Rep
4,663
Posts

Drives: F01 & F15 / Mineral White
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The GYM! (The Burbs - N TX)

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by kring View Post
I don't own you, but I can have an insurance policy on you and there's nothing you can do about it and I get paid if something were to happen to you. He OWNS the policy, and therefor the payout... FULL STOP, no discussion... now he still has obligation and likely a LEAN on the car so that would need to be fulfilled for the outstand balance. his insurance is to make HIM whole. this isn't gap insurance, it's the opposite. the gap is more than closed by the insurance proceeds and therefore, it can only be his.



That would make it a cut & dry case; but the lease may be still valid as entitled to the proceeds of the insurance.

It's not a question of If he needs to hold insurances, it absolutely is in the contract that insurance is required, and in most states it's a legal requirement and a requirement to register the vehicle.

The question is with the insurance HE signed up for and pays... why would he NOT be entitled to the money... I believe 100% he is entitled to the full amount as it's his policy... ownership is irrelevant. Now BMW would have a LEAN on the car and leans are required to be paid first... his LEAN is for the remaining balance... which is ALL that BMW is entitled to, the amount of the LEAN. after that, any remaining balance would absolutely be his. BMW's interest stops at the the cars value, anything beyond that is his interests.

Especially if the cost of cars and replacement have gone up - that would offset his loss or negative position in trying to replace like-for-like.... the whole point of the insurance policy is to be whole in the end... BMW stole his money.

fairly certain his case is rock-solid and he'll win it outright... might even get compensation.

What we don't know - is there more weird California laws or something shady in the lease fine print that says BMW is entitled to more and you waive your right... which I think could then also be challenged to the legality of that type of fine print.
Ding, ding, ding. I see there is some confusion on how insurance actually works and benefits the insured.
Appreciate 0
      06-23-2022, 10:28 AM   #17
DETRoadster
Space Force - 4 Star General
DETRoadster's Avatar
11446
Rep
3,264
Posts

Drives: M2 MG 6MT / Moto Guzzi V7
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcracin View Post
This is the correct expectation to me and expectation is all we can discuss here absent a thorough reading of the contract.
Clearly we need someone with a BMW under lease contract to read their contract and fill us in on what it says about insurance requirements!
Appreciate 1
rcracin1238.00
      06-23-2022, 10:42 AM   #18
UncleWede
Long Time Admirer, First Time Owner
UncleWede's Avatar
United_States
17883
Rep
9,376
Posts

Drives: G01 X3 M40i Dark Graphite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oxnard, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DETRoadster View Post
Clearly we need someone with a BMW under lease contract to read their contract and fill us in on what it says about insurance requirements!
Yeah, RIIIGHT!
__________________
I have romped on her and I giggled like a drunk infant the entire time. - Sedan_Clan
Appreciate 3
      06-23-2022, 10:55 AM   #19
ryan stewart
Major
2197
Rep
1,322
Posts

Drives: 2008 328it
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kring View Post
I don't own you, but I can have an insurance policy on you and there's nothing you can do about it and I get paid if something were to happen to you.
Lol, you know nothing about insurance. Why don't you try taking out a policy on me without my consent, you know my name. People think cop shows are real.

This guy doesnt own the asset, his insurance, unless he opted for some sort of optional extension of coverage similar to classics, is likely just to cover his liability of replacement of BMWs asset, just like liability for renters, even if its some sort of similar scheme where youd have the option to buy out at the end of the lease.

Last edited by ryan stewart; 06-23-2022 at 11:00 AM..
Appreciate 1
DocL1922.50
      06-23-2022, 11:10 AM   #20
G35POPPEDMYCHERRY
Banned
G35POPPEDMYCHERRY's Avatar
No_Country
4992
Rep
4,139
Posts

Drives: F80
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (1)

....AMERIKA
Appreciate 2
UncleWede17883.00
      06-23-2022, 12:16 PM   #21
TR930
Car Enthusiast
United_States
470
Rep
1,125
Posts

Drives: 2016 F80 M3 TB/AB
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Denver Area

iTrader: (4)

The insurance was to cover BMW's potential rental income loss in an accident, not the renter. Simple as that. BMW owns that car.

Even though that guy paid for the insurance, it was simply to insure he pays his remaining debt to BMW. The insurance was not there to replace any unrealized value for the leasee or BMW. Now, that being said if BMW was cut a check for that "market" value, even then I think it comes back to who actually owns the car? Once you answer that, then the entity is who incurred the loss should be the one made whole. The fact that the leasee can't find another m5 to lease at the same price as before is irrelevant. IMO

Buyer should have bought out his remaining lease payments to own the car. Then, his insurance might have cut him a check for the current market value replacement cost ( if that language was in his contract).

Last edited by TR930; 06-23-2022 at 12:32 PM..
Appreciate 1
      06-23-2022, 01:11 PM   #22
LuvMyE92
Occasionally frequent poster
LuvMyE92's Avatar
2994
Rep
2,742
Posts

Drives: CT5V-Blackwing
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: RTP NC, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXSTYLE View Post
Ding, ding, ding. I see there is some confusion on how insurance actually works and benefits the insured.


Yes, well said (written). Unfortunately, not only do people not read their finance contracts, they also don't read their insurance contracts. For instance, the clause where it says "loss payee" AKA insurable interest AKA the person that gets the money.

Also, it seems that everyone thinks that they are entitled to lottery winnings, even if they didn't buy a ticket. At least in this country.

Regardless of all of that, it was a poor decision by BMW Financial (not BMW) that is probably going to hurt them more in goodwill than the slight financial benefit. At the very least, they should have applied the $25K to the purchase of a new BMW.

As usual, the only people that will win here are the lawyers.
__________________
Current inventory:
F22 & G05
Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing w/3 pedals
Past: E24,E28(3),E34,E36,E37,E38(2),E39(4),E46,E89,E92 (obviously),F01,F06,F10,F30,F87,G12,G30(2),G82(2)
Appreciate 1
br438582.50
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST