Still want an EV? (NO POLITICS)

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Which proves what exactly?

That you are easily misled.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

That you are easily misled.

Misled about what?

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Misled about what?

You were misled about climate science by your failure to be swayed by appeal to authority logical fallacies.

[pbonsalb]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

That you are easily misled.

This is a common problem for small minded people.

[LogicalApex]

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by LogicalApex

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

Attachment 3571246

If tankers can't get through because of storms then yeah gas station supplies will dwindle, no s#it Sherlock.

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

If tankers can't get through because of storms then yeah gas station supplies will dwindle, no s#it Sherlock.

Put those goalposts back!

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

Put those goalposts back!

As you contribute nothing to the thread except for your meaningless posts, and not for the first time, you are going on ignore from now.

[gblansten]

I think it is fair to say that in certain weather events ICE vehicles may have an advantage and for others EVs may have some advantages. I saw some people on X (Twitter) talking about issues with evacuating and gas supplies. I wish everyone down in the Tampa the best. This hurricane looks monstrous.

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

Put those goalposts back!

When you say "goalposts" do you mean things like how we were told in the 1970's that the earth would enter a new ice age and be completely frozen over by Y2K? Or Al Gore telling us in the early 2000s that in 10 years all coastal cities would be inundated and underwater? Or AOC telling us @10 yrs ago that Earth would be unable to sustain life within 10 years? Those kind of goalposts?

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by 3PedalJake

When you say "goalposts" do you mean things like how we were told in the 1970's that the earth would enter a new ice age and be completely frozen over by Y2K? Or Al Gore telling us in the early 2000s that in 10 years all coastal cities would be inundated and underwater? Or AOC telling us @10 yrs ago that Earth would be unable to sustain life within 10 years? Those kind of goalposts?

AOC was not in office 10 years ago. You too have brain rot.

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

AOC was not in office 10 years ago. You too have brain rot.

She's been in the public eye telling us this since at least 2016, that's "@" 10 yrs ago. But taking your point, that means you agree we only have a couple years left on this planet. What about the snowball earth warnings? Or the coastal cities all underwater? I won't hold my breath for your reply, but expecting you'll have more ad hominems.

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by 3PedalJake

She's been in the public eye telling us this since at least 2016, that's "@" 10 yrs ago. But taking your point, that means you agree we only have a couple years left on this planet. What about the snowball earth warnings? Or the coastal cities all underwater? I won't hold my breath for your reply, but expecting you'll have more ad hominems.

Assuming i was generous, thats still not 10 years. Also, florida rn says hi.

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

Assuming i was generous, thats still not 10 years. Also, florida rn says hi.

I didn't expect you to address the goalposts question. I'll answer for you, the earth is not frozen over, nor are all the coastal cities underwater hurricanes notwithstanding, nor are we a scant few years away from climate extinction. Fact is, no one in the history of the planet has shifted goalposts farther or faster than climate alarmists.

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by 3PedalJake

I didn't expect you to address the goalposts question. I'll answer for you, the earth is not frozen over, nor are all the coastal cities underwater hurricanes notwithstanding, nor are we a scant few years away from climate extinction. Fact is, no one in the history of the planet has shifted goalposts farther or faster than climate alarmists.

Then go argue with a climate alarmist.

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

Then go argue with a climate alarmist.

Back away and take the L, good call.

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by 3PedalJake

Back away and take the L, good call.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law

More psychobabble.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

Then go argue with a climate alarmist.

"Shall it not be validated by the internet, then therefore it cannot be true".

Dumass Googleheim's razor...

[M5Rick]

Brilliant posts guys!

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by gblansten

I think it is fair to say that in certain weather events ICE vehicles may have an advantage and for others EVs may have some advantages. I saw some people on X (Twitter) talking about issues with evacuating and gas supplies. I wish everyone down in the Tampa the best. This hurricane looks monstrous.

Been following this horrific news from Florida west coast and hope everyone survives and stays safe there.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ods-winds.html
(news not politics)

[TheWatchGuy]

Originally Posted by LogicalApex

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

Attachment 3571246

did you conveniently forget that a lot of areas were without power last storm? Hard to charge if you dont have power.