do any of you NOT wear seatbelts in the car? (or have family or friends who don't?)

[KevinGS]

Originally Posted by Gemini562

Plus, think about it like this: if you’re a human cannonball who forgot to strap in, your flying self could hit another person, or you could create such a road mess that traffic’s backed up for miles. It’s not elitism; it’s just common sense. Seatbelts are kinda like paying taxes or keeping your pants on in public, nobody loves it, but it keeps things decent for everyone.

I'm a little more basic.

I told my friend who didn't want to wear a seatbelt to sprint as fast as possible and run head-first into a brick wall. Think about how much that would hurt.

Now, imagine quadrupling that speed or more, and hitting a brick wall...then think about the kind of head injury you would have at THAT speed.

Yikes!

[toosrimpeldoos]

Hi, I wear belts always in every car.
not only for my own safety, also being an example for my kids.

[KevinC]

Originally Posted by nerdogray

The amount of elitism displayed over seatbelts in this thread is absolutely laughable. I don't wear a seatbelt. I don't want to wear one.

"Elitism"

Oh the irony.

[tturedraider]

Originally Posted by nerdogray

You certainly do make the claim to know intelligence by insulting it. You and so many other people on this thread speak so condescendingly and elevate themselves far above their reality. Your claims of the belief of personal freedom are immediately contradicted by your own statement. You have a blast, too. I'm done with you, the likes of you, and the rest of this thread.

So, nerdogray, I’ll unapologetically question your intelligence. All the reasoning you give for setting yourself up to become a burden on society, whether you have anyone depending on you or not, is straight up STUPID!!

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Windshieldfarmer

The costs of not wearing a seatbelt extends way beyond the people unnecessarily injured or killed. There is tremendous societal cost in terms of elevated medical expenditures, life insurance payouts, and disability costs. All of us pay more because of the stupid and often selfish decisions of others.

The same argument can be made for airbags depending on crash severity.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by nerdogray

The amount of elitism displayed over seatbelts in this thread is absolutely laughable. I don't wear a seatbelt. I don't want to wear one. I don't have family. There is no one depending on me. There is no "societal cost" in my case. No matter how many soapboxes are mounted, I'm not going to be shamed into wearing one. It is my choice to assume the risk versus the freedom and comfort of not wearing one. No, I'm not obese; I am currently sitting at 14% body fat. I'm not unintelligent, either. But by all means, everyone should keep trying to force their opinion on those that choose differently.

Edit: There we go again. Yet another post insulting intelligence. How novel.

My position is if you are an adult, you have a right to choose what to do with you body as you see fit. I think your observation of elitism on display in this thread is well founded. The argument against your posts are the "societal costs of others not wearing a seat belt".
Well, let's expand on that. Where does the line of societal protectionism end and individual rights begin?

How about those who smoke or vape?
How about those who overeat?
How about those who eat fast food?
Drink soda?
Drink alcohol?
Take illegal drugs?
Rock climb?
Hike and get lost?
Drive in inclement weather when they lack the skill to do so or don't use the proper equipment ( i.e. snow tires)?
Ride motorcycles?

All these limited list of activities, when they go bad and affect a person's health, have a societal and insurance rates impact. Where is the line drawn?

[Hydrostream]

We had a local mother orphan her young kids about a month ago because she wasn’t wearing a seatbelt. Life’s a gamble but man…

[Slowphiveo]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

My position is if you are an adult, you have a right to choose what to do with you body as you see fit. I think your observation of elitism on display in this thread is well founded. The argument against your posts are the "societal costs of others not wearing a seat belt".
Well, let's expand on that. Where does the line of societal protectionism end and individual rights begin?

How about those who smoke or vape?
How about those who overeat?
How about those who eat fast food?
Drink soda?
Drink alcohol?
Take illegal drugs?
Rock climb?
Hike and get lost?
Drive in inclement weather when they lack the skill to do so or don't use the proper equipment ( i.e. snow tires)?
Ride motorcycles?

All these limited list of activities, when they go bad and affect a person's health, have a societal and insurance rates impact. Where is the line drawn?

I 100% agree that you should absolutely have the right to do all of those things if you choose to do so. I also believe that insurance companies should be able to deny you if you do intentionally stupid shit. If you eat 15 big Macs a day, your health insurance should deny you. If you take illegal drugs and die...no loss to me. If you drink 2 handles of JD every day and get liver disease...denied. Freedom gives you the absolute right to be a fuckwad. It does not give you the right to make me pay for it.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Slowphiveo

I 100% agree that you should absolutely have the right to do all of those things if you choose to do so. I also believe that insurance companies should be able to deny you if you do intentionally stupid shit. If you eat 15 big Macs a day, your health insurance should deny you. If you take illegal drugs and die...no loss to me. If you drink 2 handles of JD every day and get liver disease...denied. Freedom gives you the absolute right to be a fuckwad. It does not give you the right to make me pay for it.

But you probably do something that I think is fuckwadish. That's the point. In the law of averages it all evens out.