View Single Post
      10-11-2019, 02:35 PM   #325
TheWatchGuy
Colonel
TheWatchGuy's Avatar
3905
Rep
2,524
Posts

Drives: 335xi
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CO

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakefront View Post
We don't count AFL championships because they aren't NFL championships...really? We don't count USFL champs either. And nobody can seriously think that an AFL champion would have been able to give the NFL champs a competitive game in the early days of the league. And this isn't about the Packers. The Bears, Colts, Giants, Rams, etc all had great teams in 50s and 60s. I'm thinking that the toll on the players bodies was greater in 12 games at that time than the 16 games now with all the substitutions and the lack of hitting in todays game.
But, obviously, we will have to agree to disagree.
AFL and the pre merger NFL are the same thing... Neither are the actual NFL of today

NFL turned into the NFC and AFL into the AFC.

For someone that seems to be putting a lot of stock into the early football years, i didnt think that would have to be explained...

and before you go "AFL didnt have the talent level of the NFL" do you remember who won the 3rd and 4th superbowl? I'll give you a hint, they were from the AFL
__________________
@drunkcowatches on ig

Am I a watch guy, or do i watch guys?
Appreciate 0